Predictions
Matches
Calendar
H2H
Rankings
Picks Blog
Frederico Gil vs Jeremy Chardy Prediction, Head-to-Head, Odds & Pick - Matchstat.com
By Wojtek Kolan
At Matchstat.com we give you unbeatable in-depth analysis of past and current event tennis stats, to give you accurate tennis predictions, picks, odds and value bets. Let's dive in with our Gil vs Chardy analysis and find out who is favored!
Want To Bet On This Match?
After checking out our Predictions and stats analysis, we recommend opening accounts at several Sportsbooks so you can get the best possible odds for the outcome. We recommend:
BetOnline
Our favorite for great odds and reliable service with a 50% Welcome Bonus (up to $1000) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Bwin
Best for European users. Regional Welcome BonusesBetMGM
First bet offer, Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t winSportsBetting
Competitive odds. First Deposit Doubled (up to $500) + 3 months FREE Matchstat*Cashwin
Variety of betting options and 100% Welcome Bonus + 3 Months FREE Matchstat*- Bet365:
With competitive odds and live betting. Regional signup bonuses!
* To claim FREE Matchstat for 3 months – Click Here
If you’re not ready for real bets and want to practice, sign up for FREE at www.meerkatbet.com Enjoy simulated betting with our virtual currency, learn about value bets, and compete for monthly prizes in a risk-free environment.
Frederico Gil vs Jeremy Chardy Important H2H Prediction Stats:
Head-to-head: Gil 1 - 4 Chardy
- Second serve performance recent form: In recent form (last 6 months), Gil has won 0% of points on their second serve, while Chardy has won 0%. There is a high correlation between this stat and match prediction accuracy.
- Return game stats recent form: Return stats show Gil, in recent form, has won 0% of their opponent's second serve points, while Chardy has won 0%. The same stats for first serve returns are 0% and 0% respectively and this has a high correlation to pick who is favored in this H2H matchup.
- Under pressure analysis: Gil has saved 0% of breakpoints in recent form, whereas Chardy has saved 0% which is a useful statistic for in-game betting predictions.
- Performance overview: Over the last year Gil has won 0% of matches played (W/L 0/ 0), with Chardy winning 0% (W/L 0/ 1) that gives us an overall head-to head prediction overview.
- Best surface: Gil has their best career surface win % on Hard, winning 63% (W/L 224/ 131), and worse career win % on Grass, winning 33% (W/L 4/ 8). Chardy has their best career surface win % on Clay, winning 56% (W/L 210/ 162), and worse career win % on Hard, winning 51% (W/L 152/ 146).
- Direct H2H matches: They have played 5 times before with Gil winning 1 times and Chardy being victorious 4 times. They have played 17 sets in total, with Gil winning 5 and Chardy winning 12. The last match between Gil and Chardy was at the VTR Open - Vina del Mar, 03-02-2012, Quarterfinals, Clay with Jeremy Chardy getting the victory 6-2 7-6(5).
- Head to head match duration: In past head to head matches, the average match time between these players has been 0:46:11.
- Deciding set H2H prediction: Gil and Chardy have played a deciding set 2 times, with Gil winning 1 times and Chardy 1 times. Very useful for predicting the outcome if this match goes the distance.
- Head-to-Head extreme pressure situations: They have played 3 tiebreaks against each other with Gil winning 1, and Chardy 2.
- Opponent quality stats: Over the last 12 months, Gil has played against opponents with an average rank of while Chardy has played against players with an average rank of 32.
- Deciding set performance vs all players: If you are interested in live predictions and betting, if this match goes into a deciding set, Gil has won 0% of deciding sets over the last 12 months, while Chardy has won 0% in all matches played on tour.
- Break point conversion: In recent form, Gil has converted 0% of breakpoint opportunities, and Chardy has converted 0% of their chances to break their opponents serve. A telling stat for in-game live betting tips when either player has a breakpoint opportunity.
- If you are interested in models that predict tennis matches, this article is a good start (Warning: Stats geeks only)
Ret.
Rank
62
High
39
Age
R
Plays
1
Total4
0
Hard1
1
Clay2
0
Indoor0
0
Grass1
876
Rank
25
High
37
Age
R
Plays
W
W
L
W
L
L
L
W
W
L
Form
W
L
L
L
W
L
L
L
L
L
59% (597-422)
Career Total W/L
54% (494-426)
0% (0-0)
YTD W/L
0% (0-0)
$437,805
Career Prize Money
$5,487,593
0
YTD Titles
0
Currently displayed stats includes matches of all levels. To exclude lower level events (as per ATP / WTA official stats) toggle button in page footer.
The Best Odds For Frederico Gil vs Jeremy Chardy For Any Market:
We highly recommend you open accounts with at least 3 Bookmakers as depending on the match, odds can vary a lot between them, and always getting the best odds available will improve your profitability a lot in the long run. We recommend these Sportsbooks for you so sign up now! Check the current best odds by clicking the Sportsbook links below:
Sportsbooks & Bookies Promo Codes For Gil VS Chardy
Get up to $1500 in bonuses if you don’t win!
Welcome bonuses
First Deposit DoubledÂ
(Up to $500 is doubled on initial deposit)
+
Regional Signup Bonuses
With competitive adds and live betting
| stats | Frederico Gil | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| All H2H Matches | 1 | 4 |
| Sets Won | 5 | 12 |
| Games Won | 72 | 95 |
| Aces (Total) | 18 | 49 |
| DFs Total | 22 | 26 |
| Avg Match Time | 0:46:11 | 0:46:11 |
| 1st Serve % | 66% (353/536) | 65% (322/495) |
| 1st Serve Win% | 68% (241/353) | 78% (252/322) |
| 2nd Serve Win% | 51% (93/183) | 53% (92/173) |
| BPs Won% (Total) | 30% (8/27) | 33% (19/58) |
| Return Points W% | 31% (151/495) | 38% (202/536) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/3) | 100% (3/3) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 33% (1/3) | 67% (2/3) |
| Deciding Set Win% | 50% (1/2) | 50% (1/2) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (1/0) | 75% (4/3) |
| 1st set W, L | 100% (1/1) | 25% (4/1) |
| 1st set L, W | 25% (4/1) | 100% (1/1) |
| Winning Player | Losing Player | Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 6-2 7-6(5) |
Stats 
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frederico Gil
61%
(
37 of
61)
1st Serve %
53%
(
40 of
76)
3
Aces
0
2
Double Faults
4
76%
(
28 of
37)
1st Serve Won
70%
(
28 of
40)
63%
(
15 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
44%
(
16 of
36)
25%
(
3 of
12)
Break Points Won
100%
(
1 of
1)
30%
(
18 of
61)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
32 of
76)
75
Total Points Won
62
|
||||
| 2-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Jeremy Chardy
76%
(
65 of
86)
1st Serve %
66%
(
63 of
96)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
7
69%
(
45 of
65)
1st Serve Won
73%
(
46 of
63)
52%
(
11 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
15 of
33)
20%
(
2 of
10)
Break Points Won
67%
(
2 of
3)
35%
(
30 of
86)
Rtn Points Won
36%
(
35 of
96)
91
Total Points Won
91
|
||||
| 3-6 6-3 6-2 6-3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frederico Gil
70%
(
69 of
99)
1st Serve %
68%
(
78 of
115)
11
Aces
6
1
Double Faults
3
70%
(
48 of
69)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
49 of
78)
67%
(
20 of
30)
2nd Serve Won
54%
(
20 of
37)
38%
(
6 of
16)
Break Points Won
33%
(
2 of
6)
31%
(
31 of
99)
Rtn Points Won
40%
(
46 of
115)
114
Total Points Won
100
|
||||
| 7-5 6-7(1) 4-6 6-4 6-3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frederico Gil
61%
(
98 of
161)
1st Serve %
66%
(
106 of
160)
21
Aces
5
13
Double Faults
8
86%
(
84 of
98)
1st Serve Won
72%
(
76 of
106)
46%
(
29 of
63)
2nd Serve Won
63%
(
34 of
54)
21%
(
3 of
14)
Break Points Won
17%
(
1 of
6)
30%
(
48 of
161)
Rtn Points Won
31%
(
50 of
160)
163
Total Points Won
158
|
||||
| 6-3 6-2 7-6(1) |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Frederico Gil
71%
(
55 of
78)
1st Serve %
65%
(
64 of
99)
9
Aces
2
3
Double Faults
3
84%
(
46 of
55)
1st Serve Won
67%
(
43 of
64)
57%
(
13 of
23)
2nd Serve Won
34%
(
12 of
35)
38%
(
5 of
13)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
24%
(
19 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
44 of
99)
103
Total Points Won
74
|
||||
Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| stats | Frederico Gil | Jeremy Chardy |
|---|---|---|
| YTD W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Sets Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Games Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Hard Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Grass Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Aces pg | 0 | 0 |
| Aces Total | 0 | 0 |
| DFs per game | 0 | 0 |
| DFs Total | 0 | 0 |
| Avg Match Time | 1st Match | 1st Match |
| Avg Opp Rank | 0 | 0 |
| 1st Serve % | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 2nd Serve W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| BPs Won% Total | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Return Pts W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Slam W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Masters W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Cups W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Main Tour W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Tour Finals W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Challenger W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Futures W/L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 3 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Best of 5 Sets W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| TBs Win% (Total) | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| Deciding Set W% | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set W, L | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
| 1st set L, W | 0% (0/0) | 0% (0/0) |
Frederico Gil Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Paul Jubb
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
23 of
39)
1st Serve %
65%
(
32 of
49)
2
Aces
1
4
Double Faults
3
74%
(
17 of
23)
1st Serve Won
41%
(
13 of
32)
63%
(
10 of
16)
2nd Serve Won
35%
(
6 of
17)
100%
(
6 of
6)
Break Points Won
20%
(
1 of
5)
31%
(
12 of
39)
Rtn Points Won
61%
(
30 of
49)
57
Total Points Won
31
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| QF | 6-2 6-1 | H2H | |||
| Q2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Andre Stewart
58%
(
30 of
52)
1st Serve %
54%
(
25 of
46)
2
Aces
0
0
Double Faults
4
67%
(
20 of
30)
1st Serve Won
52%
(
13 of
25)
68%
(
15 of
22)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
8 of
21)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
33%
(
17 of
52)
Rtn Points Won
54%
(
25 of
46)
60
Total Points Won
38
|
6-2 6-0 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Harry Wendelken
Player
Frederico Gil
48%
(
31 of
64)
1st Serve %
60%
(
43 of
72)
5
Aces
5
4
Double Faults
1
74%
(
23 of
31)
1st Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
48%
(
16 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
48%
(
14 of
29)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
100%
(
4 of
4)
39%
(
25 of
64)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
34 of
72)
73
Total Points Won
63
|
6-4 7-6(3) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Tomas Lipovsek Puches
Player
Frederico Gil
60%
(
32 of
53)
1st Serve %
52%
(
26 of
50)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
1
81%
(
26 of
32)
1st Serve Won
54%
(
14 of
26)
48%
(
10 of
21)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
2)
32%
(
17 of
53)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
26 of
50)
62
Total Points Won
41
|
6-1 6-2 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Simon Carr
Player
Frederico Gil
59%
(
26 of
44)
1st Serve %
52%
(
24 of
46)
2
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
4
85%
(
22 of
26)
1st Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
56%
(
10 of
18)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
6)
27%
(
12 of
44)
Rtn Points Won
59%
(
27 of
46)
59
Total Points Won
31
|
6-1 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
63%
(
61 of
97)
1st Serve %
50%
(
46 of
92)
5
Aces
10
5
Double Faults
12
70%
(
43 of
61)
1st Serve Won
78%
(
36 of
46)
50%
(
18 of
36)
2nd Serve Won
46%
(
21 of
46)
83%
(
5 of
6)
Break Points Won
50%
(
4 of
8)
37%
(
36 of
97)
Rtn Points Won
38%
(
35 of
92)
96
Total Points Won
93
|
4-6 6-4 7-5 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Eduardo Struvay
Player
Frederico Gil
71%
(
25 of
35)
1st Serve %
61%
(
23 of
38)
5
Aces
1
-
Double Faults
-
68%
(
17 of
25)
1st Serve Won
65%
(
15 of
23)
50%
(
5 of
10)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
7 of
15)
25%
(
1 of
4)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
37%
(
13 of
35)
Rtn Points Won
42%
(
16 of
38)
38
Total Points Won
35
|
5-4 ret. | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Marat Deviatiarov
61%
(
64 of
105)
1st Serve %
53%
(
41 of
77)
3
Aces
1
5
Double Faults
7
53%
(
34 of
64)
1st Serve Won
59%
(
24 of
41)
51%
(
21 of
41)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
18 of
36)
67%
(
6 of
9)
Break Points Won
46%
(
6 of
13)
48%
(
50 of
105)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
35 of
77)
90
Total Points Won
92
|
6-3 1-6 7-5 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Frederico Gil
Player
Riccardo Maiga
64%
(
49 of
77)
1st Serve %
44%
(
31 of
70)
2
Aces
4
2
Double Faults
10
63%
(
31 of
49)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
22 of
31)
39%
(
11 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
38%
(
15 of
39)
56%
(
5 of
9)
Break Points Won
71%
(
5 of
7)
45%
(
35 of
77)
Rtn Points Won
47%
(
33 of
70)
75
Total Points Won
72
|
6-3 0-6 6-2 | H2H | ||
view more
Jeremy Chardy Recent Matches Played
Before:
| OPPONENT | Score | H2H | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| R1 |
Stats
Carlos Alcaraz
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
45 of
73)
1st Serve %
65%
(
61 of
94)
10
Aces
1
2
Double Faults
10
84%
(
38 of
45)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
35 of
61)
61%
(
17 of
28)
2nd Serve Won
30%
(
10 of
33)
50%
(
7 of
14)
Break Points Won
25%
(
1 of
4)
25%
(
18 of
73)
Rtn Points Won
52%
(
49 of
94)
104
Total Points Won
63
|
6-0 6-2 7-5 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Mackenzie Mcdonald
Player
Jeremy Chardy
55%
(
33 of
60)
1st Serve %
48%
(
31 of
64)
7
Aces
3
3
Double Faults
6
82%
(
27 of
33)
1st Serve Won
81%
(
25 of
31)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
39%
(
13 of
33)
75%
(
3 of
4)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
27%
(
16 of
60)
Rtn Points Won
41%
(
26 of
64)
70
Total Points Won
54
|
6-2 7-6(4) | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Lorenzo Sonego
Player
Jeremy Chardy
69%
(
31 of
45)
1st Serve %
55%
(
29 of
53)
2
Aces
1
0
Double Faults
7
84%
(
26 of
31)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
18 of
29)
50%
(
7 of
14)
2nd Serve Won
29%
(
7 of
24)
67%
(
4 of
6)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
27%
(
12 of
45)
Rtn Points Won
53%
(
28 of
53)
61
Total Points Won
37
|
6-2 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Hugo Gaston
Player
Jeremy Chardy
51%
(
25 of
49)
1st Serve %
61%
(
35 of
57)
3
Aces
0
1
Double Faults
5
88%
(
22 of
25)
1st Serve Won
57%
(
20 of
35)
46%
(
11 of
24)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
9 of
22)
63%
(
5 of
8)
Break Points Won
100%
(
2 of
2)
33%
(
16 of
49)
Rtn Points Won
49%
(
28 of
57)
61
Total Points Won
45
|
6-3 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R2 |
Stats
Daniel Evans
Player
Jeremy Chardy
62%
(
44 of
71)
1st Serve %
76%
(
62 of
82)
8
Aces
6
0
Double Faults
5
82%
(
36 of
44)
1st Serve Won
58%
(
36 of
62)
63%
(
17 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
50%
(
10 of
20)
55%
(
6 of
11)
Break Points Won
50%
(
1 of
2)
25%
(
18 of
71)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
36 of
82)
89
Total Points Won
64
|
6-4 6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Daniel Elahi Galan
61%
(
96 of
157)
1st Serve %
60%
(
73 of
122)
7
Aces
2
14
Double Faults
4
68%
(
65 of
96)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
45 of
73)
43%
(
26 of
61)
2nd Serve Won
45%
(
22 of
49)
41%
(
7 of
17)
Break Points Won
19%
(
5 of
26)
42%
(
66 of
157)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
55 of
122)
146
Total Points Won
133
|
1-6 7-5 6-1 6-4 | H2H | ||
| R1 |
Stats
Matteo Berrettini
Player
Jeremy Chardy
67%
(
67 of
100)
1st Serve %
64%
(
77 of
120)
17
Aces
12
1
Double Faults
3
81%
(
54 of
67)
1st Serve Won
71%
(
55 of
77)
70%
(
23 of
33)
2nd Serve Won
56%
(
24 of
43)
30%
(
3 of
10)
Break Points Won
33%
(
1 of
3)
23%
(
23 of
100)
Rtn Points Won
34%
(
41 of
120)
118
Total Points Won
102
|
7-6(5) 7-6(7) 6-3 | H2H | ||
| Q1 |
Stats
Tennys Sandgren
Player
Jeremy Chardy
63%
(
45 of
72)
1st Serve %
63%
(
40 of
64)
6
Aces
8
6
Double Faults
6
76%
(
34 of
45)
1st Serve Won
63%
(
25 of
40)
41%
(
11 of
27)
2nd Serve Won
42%
(
10 of
24)
50%
(
4 of
8)
Break Points Won
50%
(
2 of
4)
38%
(
27 of
72)
Rtn Points Won
45%
(
29 of
64)
74
Total Points Won
62
|
7-6(6) 6-1 | H2H | ||
| QF |
Stats
Alexander Zverev
Player
Jeremy Chardy
74%
(
28 of
38)
1st Serve %
68%
(
42 of
62)
11
Aces
4
1
Double Faults
3
86%
(
24 of
28)
1st Serve Won
62%
(
26 of
42)
89%
(
8 of
9)
2nd Serve Won
41%
(
7 of
17)
33%
(
4 of
12)
Break Points Won
0%
(
0 of
0)
14%
(
5 of
37)
Rtn Points Won
44%
(
26 of
59)
61
Total Points Won
39
|
6-4 6-1 | H2H | ||
| R3 |
Stats
Jeremy Chardy
Player
Liam Broady
58%
(
49 of
84)
1st Serve %
70%
(
76 of
108)
11
Aces
6
6
Double Faults
2
82%
(
40 of
49)
1st Serve Won
61%
(
46 of
76)
59%
(
17 of
29)
2nd Serve Won
47%
(
14 of
30)
40%
(
4 of
10)
Break Points Won
75%
(
3 of
4)
27%
(
21 of
78)
Rtn Points Won
43%
(
46 of
106)
105
Total Points Won
87
|
7-6(3) 4-6 6-1 | H2H | ||
view more
Gil Vs Chardy Prediction H2H Images To Share
More tennis photos of Gil are available here and Chardy photos here.
Today's H2H Tennis Betting Tips & Predictions
If you are looking to predict tennis or soccer matches, Matchstat.com has you covered! We have league, player and team stats, and specialise in detailed h2h stats between tennis players or soccer teams.
All our predictions are based on machine learning and AI. Matchstat is designed to help you in your analysis and predictions but the responsibility for your final predictions are your own.
It's good to talk... Get in touch with us [email protected]
